A routing page, not a scoreboard
Two real ways to build the same invitation. One is a WhatsApp assistant you message; one is a conversational studio in the browser. Here is what each suits, and why the finished page is identical.
Jitabi and Clara are both real and both shipped, and the honest thing to say first is that neither is the better tool in the abstract. They are two doors to the same event site. Jitabi is the assistant you message on WhatsApp; Clara is the conversational studio that lives in the browser at clara.myjoyfullday.com. You describe the event to either, and what appears is a genuine multi-section invitation page you can edit, publish and share.
So the question is not which one builds a better page — they hand you the same object underneath. The question is which door fits the moment you are planning in, and that genuinely depends on where you are and how much you want to see.
You are away from a desk, the plan is coming together in pieces, and you would rather message than navigate. The chat holds the whole build on one phone screen, and it stays reachable for quick edits after the invites are out.
You are sitting at something with a keyboard and want the page spread out in front of you as you describe it. The browser studio suits the pass where you are choosing designs, filling galleries and reordering sections by eye.
Both draft from ordinary language, both keep the page editable, and both end at the same published myjoyfullday.site site with replies landing on the same guest list. One event, whichever window you worked in.
One note that applies to both, because people ask it of each: this is not a bot sitting in your family group, and it does not read your chats or pull names from your contacts. Whether you build with Jitabi or Clara, the assistant talks only to you, and your guests never touch that conversation. They receive the finished link, answer on the page, and their replies collect on your list. The two tools differ in where you build; they agree entirely on how the invitation behaves once it is sent.
How it works
To Jitabi on WhatsApp or to Clara in the browser — the same description is the brief either way, and both return a real page you can react to.
A quick time change is faster as a reply in the chat; reshaping sections or loading a gallery is calmer in the browser. They act on one event.
Whichever tool you finished in, the page gets the same shareable address, private until you decide to publish it.
Guest answers land on the same guest list, with plus-ones counted against your cap, no matter which door built the invitation.
Questions
Neither, for the same page. They are two doors — WhatsApp and browser — to one event site, both shipped and both drafting from ordinary words. Pick by where you are building: on a phone, use Jitabi; at a desk with galleries to fill, use Clara.
Yes. Chat and browser work on the same underlying event, so a page begun in Jitabi can be finished in Clara without starting over, and it does not split your guest list into two competing versions.
You do. Both build a genuine multi-section invitation published at a myjoyfullday.site address with a reply button attached. The difference is the interface you built it through, not the site your guests open.
No, and neither does Jitabi. There is no group bot and no contact import on either path. The assistant speaks to you, the host; guests reply on the page, and the list grows only from those answers.
The same account underlies both doors, so neither costs extra to reach for. You start free and upgrade as your guest list grows; the plans and their numbers live on the pricing page rather than here.
Get Started
Phone or desk, commute or kitchen table — Jitabi and Clara build the same invitation page. Choose whichever fits the moment and stop comparing.
